Of how babies and young learn

 My impression is that babies have a good way of pbserving and understanding via senses, sensatilns, etc, natural life and characteristics of different persons' ways of life, professional inclination, skills and things done, plus something about their sphere of life. But that babies do not have so much knowledge of the social possibilities to live a life of their own type of persons. So bebies are searching for that kibd of info and learnkng about the life possibilities around. So a baby may be intellugent and talented in it's own areas of strenght, but it is at some early phace of learning about life. Parents on the other hand may be each of their own kind and use their schooled ways of thinking and schooled picture of the world a lot. So they refer often to words, while the chikd refers to life situatilns observed from a more felt perspective of learning basic skills and wisdom of life. So as far as I know, babies and children seldom make faulty claims by words, but instead parents may say something wrong, while the child's perspective is concentrated in sensing what kind of action is this, what are the types of deeds done in it, are there different versilns of them, etc, and so the words are often secondary, used like taught or like suits the skill the child is practising. And so errors between terms are often mistakes or lies of the adults, and not some low level of skills of the child. A child may be more skilled, responsible and individual than the parents, at least I used to be, but such does not mean the child being dominant in practice, but it does mean that the things should be tuned according to each individual and not as if all skills were like knowledge, better always those of adults. A skilled child ought to be let be more sovereign when tuning influencies, help, etc, since the comfortable social distance and other factors vary depending on the individuals and the situation at hand. 

There being a shortage of something or it having just always ended for one much wanting such to one's life, is often a question of it being tuned according to some other individual's, culture's or place's characteristics, so a different type of individuality, relationship to the civiluced society, or the like is supposed the right way to approach such, which often means that they are supposed to be of the same group as you and they are supposed to be a good qualuty professional and high degree of individuality and very moral and good quality professional valuing jyst such in the world. While they are not. 

School is supposed to teach children skills and knowledge, so to make them st least a little bit more independent each passing month or some other period of school pupil's life. So if a teachers sends to children some stronger obligation toward obedient studying during freetime or coming years, it typically was not asked for the child in question, if the child does study in school, but instead parents were interested in school and wished for some such option for themselves sometimes, but propably not a daily obligation at all.