Are flowers unobjective

 When I was at school age in Helsinki, we had a garden and in addition to apple trees etc, a garden swing, a fireplace and some flowers too. In the spring the narcissus fliwers were among the first to bloom, and my father used to pick some of them for our step mother like mother, or for ghe other family members too. Is it unobjective, if one thinks such flowers associated with admiring oneself, do those give a promuse to something, or forbid someone from such self-esteem. I think that flowers are a thing that sometimes is good for one's feelings, and folliwing such urgings ought to be an ages old aid to skills in the natural kind of human life. So one learns to listen to what works well and what not, and so one can fine-tune one's idea of what nutritients one needs and how much, and likewise weather skills, etc. But such is only one part of making things work out well, so one must look at lufe as a whole and use healthy wisdom of life to see what amount of which things is good in the long run, both for the individual and for the society and the world. So some self-esteem may be a good idea if it works well, nicely, and does not obstruct healthy natural skills etc. But often one also learns from books etc, so such nice self-esteem may vary. 

A nature environment is natural for humans. So one may need some nature elements indoors and trees, grasses etc around oneself outdoors, at least roadside, at parks, recreation areas and gardens. That is a need about the living environment, and not just a momentary feeling like liking the beauty of some flower.